Lonely Loneliness

You suffer from loneliness because you have no girl riend???

Question:

 just from what i see of you , you are a judgemental prude.  But maybe you misrepresent yourself and I am wrong. "well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die" if all the fun people died we would be left with only people who are funny but not fun. an alcoholic or drug addict can be useful for providing some of the world’s greatest literature , art , music and  surgery  a slut can be useful for people with low esteem who find it otherwise difficult to gain sexual experience (because they ‘respect’ themself too much) moc.rr.xoc@mla  (ALM) wrote >On 01 Nov 2001 16:49:12 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: >>bollocks >>everyone has some use >>respect them at least for that! >No they don’t! There are plenty of useless people: alcoholics, sluts >(well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die,) murderers >.. generally any kind of criminal, really.

(not that women have the answers to everything)

Response:

On Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:33:08 -0500, WickedSS <Wicke…@localhost.localdomain> wrote: >Wow… >You know I minored in Criminology in college, and that is a very popular >attitude with most serial killers…

Okay, so I’ll be a serial killer. Seeing as nobody these days seems to think anyone should be accountable for their actions, I see no real problem with a line of work like that.  Well, nobody else will, anyway. >If somebody likes sex a lot, why does that make them not worth living?

They’re a base being, living only for physical pleasure.  It’s pathetic. A person like that is incapable of commitment, emotion, and intelligence. > If >somebody likes to drink, why are they any less of a human being?  

Any kind of addiction is a sign of a weak character.  Why would anyone want to deal with a person like that? >So, by >your logic, if you get a speeding ticket, or a parking ticket, you are a >useless person.  

*GrumblE* Fine, fine, we’ll take it to extremes. Yes, anyone with any kind of record is a criminal in every respect of the word, regardless of the severity or classification of a crime.  A parking ticket is the same as first degree murder or rape. >What if you have a criminal record for protesting >something you strongly believe in? Are you still worthless?

Yeah, sure, a person who fights for their rights is the same as a burglar. [Rolls eyes.] Obviously, it’s asking too much for you to be able to actually think. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Here is a breif list of people that were either "sluts" "criminals" or >(possibly) chemically dependant, so by your definition they were >worthless: >Benjamin Franklin – Womanizer, heavy drinker >Sigmund Freud – Cocain addict >John F. Kennedy – male "Slut" >Mark Twain – Womanizer, heavy drinker >Vincent Van Gogh – Womanizer, alcoholic >William Shakespear – heavy drinker >Mozart – Drinker, Slut >Beethoven – Drinker >Every Founding Father of the USA – "Criminals" by English law >Boy, the list can go on and on and on…  if things were your way, what a >terrible, lonely, boring world you would live in.

Hey, you know, you’re right! How about we get a child molesting alcoholic to baby sit your children.  Since you think it’s so perfectly alright for people to do awful things and have no morals, it should be a-okay, right? (See, I can set up straw men, too!) >Remember… every absolute statement is false, excluding this one.

How convenient. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->-WickedSS >On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, ALM wrote: >> On 01 Nov 2001 16:49:12 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: >> >bollocks >> >everyone has some use >> >respect them at least for that! >> No they don’t! There are plenty of useless people: alcoholics, sluts >> (well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die,) murderers >> .. generally any kind of criminal, really. >> >>True, but love and respect must be earned.  A worthless person doesn’t >> >>deserve such things. >> ALM #129dx———————– >> E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla >> (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) >> Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

ALM #129dx———————– E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

Wow… You know I minored in Criminology in college, and that is a very popular attitude with most serial killers… If somebody likes sex a lot, why does that make them not worth living?  If somebody likes to drink, why are they any less of a human being?  So, by your logic, if you get a speeding ticket, or a parking ticket, you are a useless person.  What if you have a criminal record for protesting something you strongly believe in? Are you still worthless? Here is a breif list of people that were either "sluts" "criminals" or (possibly) chemically dependant, so by your definition they were worthless: Benjamin Franklin – Womanizer, heavy drinker Sigmund Freud – Cocain addict John F. Kennedy – male "Slut" Mark Twain – Womanizer, heavy drinker Vincent Van Gogh – Womanizer, alcoholic William Shakespear – heavy drinker Mozart – Drinker, Slut Beethoven – Drinker Every Founding Father of the USA – "Criminals" by English law Boy, the list can go on and on and on…  if things were your way, what a terrible, lonely, boring world you would live in. Remember… every absolute statement is false, excluding this one. -WickedSS – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, ALM wrote: > On 01 Nov 2001 16:49:12 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: > >bollocks > >everyone has some use > >respect them at least for that! > No they don’t! There are plenty of useless people: alcoholics, sluts > (well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die,) murderers > .. generally any kind of criminal, really. > >>True, but love and respect must be earned.  A worthless person doesn’t > >>deserve such things. > ALM #129dx———————– > E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla > (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) > Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

there is still hope for you darling! >From: moc.rr.xoc@mla  (ALM) >There’s a difference between judgement and death.

(not that women have the answers to everything)

Response:

Darkfalz, I agree with you… what is this all about American Culture? I’m from Mexico and I feel the same… I have a lot of friends, I was married and have a child. Since my divorce, I’ve had 5 or 6 girls with me but no one, no one could captive me and I was feeling lonely… until now, that I’ve found THAT SPECIAL SOMEONE but she is… a little far beyond of my reach (though not impossible). Do you want to know the tragedy? Please read the thread "Stuck with a young girl" later in this forum. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -"Darkfalz" <wpeth…@bond.edu.au> wrote in message <news:mBwD7.5029$Dc6.73354@news.easynews.com>… > This is all well and good, but if you DON’T have a girlfriend and you never > have had one, it does tend to consume you just a bit. Some people have a > load of friends and are never alone, but they feel lonely still because they > don’t HAVE that special someone.

Response:

Can I ask WHAT your basis is for this venomous post??? "leolee" <leole…@my-deja.com> wrote in message

news:d47e14e6.0110292149.7e083826@posting.google.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Are you suffering from loneliness because you have no girl friend? >  Is Girl friend answer to your loneliness? if you say yes on either of > that, >  you must be another stupid naive American sicko. NO matter how many > girl > friend you have had or whether you have or not, your loneliness can > never >  be solved by girl friend. If you do not understand what this mean, > you are in big trouble that. It has been known that intimacy is not > really > the answer to the loneliness. The solution is more dynamic than simply >  friendship is all the answer. > I’m truly sicked and tired of a bunch of stupid  American sicko’s > girl-friendless lamentation. This is your culture disease that taught > by your > sick culture. > I do believe that the solution for loneliness is more deeper than > having > friendship or companion.

Response:

yes by your standards I am a SLUT but don’t waste your sympathy ,  I am a happy one changing the subject : this "no wonder you’re lonely business"  (used rather illogically in this case as most SLAGS like me know a practical if short term way to cope with loneliness) it is used so often as a kind of putdown that it makes me think that lonely guys like you must be very tough on themselves as well as others can’t you see ANYTHING good or interesting about yourself? I think you’re quite interesting because you are so easily provoked. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Ah, so you’re a slut! I’ve proven my point. No wonder you’re lonely: >you’ll never amount to anything other than a good night’s fuck to >someone. I’m sorry for you.

Response:

No wonder you are lonely… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, ALM wrote: > On 02 Nov 2001 00:22:08 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: > > just from what i see of you , you are a judgemental prude.  But maybe you > >misrepresent yourself and I am wrong. > The only people who have some kind of problem with judgement are the > immoral types with sordid pasts who KNOW they’d be judged poorly, and > rightfully so! The problem is that these people never mature and so > insist that they should never ever be held accountable for their > actions. It’s sad. > >"well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die" > >if all the fun people died we would be left with only people who are funny but > >not fun. > >an alcoholic or drug addict can be useful for providing some of the world’s > >greatest literature , art , music and  surgery > "Of the 41,967 traffic fatalities in 1997, 39% were alcohol-related > (i.e., either the driver of the crash vehicle or an affected person > not in a vehicle (e.g., a pedestrian or a bicyclist) had a blood > alcohol concentration of at least 0.01 gram per deciliter (g/dL)." > [Center for Disease Control and Prevention] > You’re right! We need more alcoholics in this world! > > a slut can be useful for people with low esteem who find it otherwise > >difficult to gain sexual experience (because they ‘respect’ themself too much) > Killing a person who has a different sexual partner each night is like > breaking a vibrator. > >moc.rr.xoc@mla  (ALM) wrote > >>On 01 Nov 2001 16:49:12 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: > >>>bollocks > >>>everyone has some use > >>>respect them at least for that! > >>No they don’t! There are plenty of useless people: alcoholics, sluts > >>(well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die,) murderers > >>.. generally any kind of criminal, really. > >(not that women have the answers to everything) > ALM #129dx———————– > E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla > (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) > Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

Wow, you are a very angry person.  You need help.  I would suggest seeing a therapist, seriously. I hope you find the help you despirately need… -WickedSS – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, ALM wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:33:08 -0500, WickedSS > <Wicke…@localhost.localdomain> wrote: > >Wow… > >You know I minored in Criminology in college, and that is a very popular > >attitude with most serial killers… > Okay, so I’ll be a serial killer. Seeing as nobody these days seems to > think anyone should be accountable for their actions, I see no real > problem with a line of work like that.  Well, nobody else will, > anyway. > >If somebody likes sex a lot, why does that make them not worth living? > They’re a base being, living only for physical pleasure.  It’s > pathetic. A person like that is incapable of commitment, emotion, and > intelligence. > > If > >somebody likes to drink, why are they any less of a human being? > Any kind of addiction is a sign of a weak character.  Why would anyone > want to deal with a person like that? > >So, by > >your logic, if you get a speeding ticket, or a parking ticket, you are a > >useless person. > *GrumblE* Fine, fine, we’ll take it to extremes. Yes, anyone with any > kind of record is a criminal in every respect of the word, regardless > of the severity or classification of a crime.  A parking ticket is the > same as first degree murder or rape. > >What if you have a criminal record for protesting > >something you strongly believe in? Are you still worthless? > Yeah, sure, a person who fights for their rights is the same as a > burglar. [Rolls eyes.] Obviously, it’s asking too much for you to be > able to actually think. > >Here is a breif list of people that were either "sluts" "criminals" or > >(possibly) chemically dependant, so by your definition they were > >worthless: > >Benjamin Franklin – Womanizer, heavy drinker > >Sigmund Freud – Cocain addict > >John F. Kennedy – male "Slut" > >Mark Twain – Womanizer, heavy drinker > >Vincent Van Gogh – Womanizer, alcoholic > >William Shakespear – heavy drinker > >Mozart – Drinker, Slut > >Beethoven – Drinker > >Every Founding Father of the USA – "Criminals" by English law > >Boy, the list can go on and on and on…  if things were your way, what a > >terrible, lonely, boring world you would live in. > Hey, you know, you’re right! How about we get a child molesting > alcoholic to baby sit your children.  Since you think it’s so > perfectly alright for people to do awful things and have no morals, it > should be a-okay, right? (See, I can set up straw men, too!) > >Remember… every absolute statement is false, excluding this one. > How convenient. > >-WickedSS > >On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, ALM wrote: > >> On 01 Nov 2001 16:49:12 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: > >> >bollocks > >> >everyone has some use > >> >respect them at least for that! > >> No they don’t! There are plenty of useless people: alcoholics, sluts > >> (well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die,) murderers > >> .. generally any kind of criminal, really. > >> >>True, but love and respect must be earned.  A worthless person doesn’t > >> >>deserve such things. > >> ALM #129dx———————– > >> E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla > >> (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) > >> Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm > ALM #129dx———————– > E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla > (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) > Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

On 02 Nov 2001 10:38:23 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: >by what seems to be your standards i must have a terribly flaky past therefore >it goes without saying that you would judge me poorly. However as I enjoyed the >past and likewise the unsordid and sombre present, I don’t give hardly a shit >about you wishing to offend me.  

Ah, so you’re a slut! I’ve proven my point. No wonder you’re lonely: you’ll never amount to anything other than a good night’s fuck to someone. I’m sorry for you. >So don’t worry I would not take it personally. >anyway I  can’t agree that the only people who would have a problem with >judgement are sordid degenerate types .  I heard recently of a lot of people >falling from buildings. >They can’t all have been promiscuous drunkards.

There’s a difference between judgement and death. >>The only people who have some kind of problem with judgement are the >>immoral types with sordid pasts who KNOW they’d be judged poorly, and >>rightfully so! The problem is that these people never mature and so >>insist that they should never ever be held accountable for their >>actions. It’s sad. >(not that women have the answers to everything)

ALM #129dx———————– E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

not much of a challenge I agree. so how come you persist with these sort of fantasies? >Killing a person who has a different sexual partner each night is like >breaking a vibrator.

(not that women have the answers to everything)

Response:

by what seems to be your standards i must have a terribly flaky past therefore it goes without saying that you would judge me poorly. However as I enjoyed the past and likewise the unsordid and sombre present, I don’t give hardly a shit about you wishing to offend me.  So don’t worry I would not take it personally. anyway I  can’t agree that the only people who would have a problem with judgement are sordid degenerate types .  I heard recently of a lot of people falling from buildings. They can’t all have been promiscuous drunkards. >The only people who have some kind of problem with judgement are the >immoral types with sordid pasts who KNOW they’d be judged poorly, and >rightfully so! The problem is that these people never mature and so >insist that they should never ever be held accountable for their >actions. It’s sad.

(not that women have the answers to everything)

Response:

On 02 Nov 2001 00:22:08 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: > just from what i see of you , you are a judgemental prude.  But maybe you >misrepresent yourself and I am wrong.

The only people who have some kind of problem with judgement are the immoral types with sordid pasts who KNOW they’d be judged poorly, and rightfully so! The problem is that these people never mature and so insist that they should never ever be held accountable for their actions. It’s sad. >"well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die" >if all the fun people died we would be left with only people who are funny but >not fun. >an alcoholic or drug addict can be useful for providing some of the world’s >greatest literature , art , music and  surgery

"Of the 41,967 traffic fatalities in 1997, 39% were alcohol-related (i.e., either the driver of the crash vehicle or an affected person not in a vehicle (e.g., a pedestrian or a bicyclist) had a blood alcohol concentration of at least 0.01 gram per deciliter (g/dL)." [Center for Disease Control and Prevention] You’re right! We need more alcoholics in this world! > a slut can be useful for people with low esteem who find it otherwise >difficult to gain sexual experience (because they ‘respect’ themself too much)

Killing a person who has a different sexual partner each night is like breaking a vibrator. >moc.rr.xoc@mla  (ALM) wrote >>On 01 Nov 2001 16:49:12 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: >>>bollocks >>>everyone has some use >>>respect them at least for that! >>No they don’t! There are plenty of useless people: alcoholics, sluts >>(well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die,) murderers >>.. generally any kind of criminal, really. >(not that women have the answers to everything)

ALM #129dx———————– E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

It’s really a point of view of the beholder. Whereby an act of kindness and compassion is seen by an outside observer as merely being wasted on that situation. There’s always a greater point of view (in which we do not see) in which things have their place in the scheme of things. eg. The Sept 11th tragedy brought forth a great deal of compassion     and kindness towards those who suffered – and made the world aware     of what really is important?     The US government would have the public believe that work as usual     is the best thing to do – but anyone with any sense would feel     that it brought out, that human connections in love is most     important above everything else. Harvey In article <20011031193708.15693.00000…@mb-ms.aol.com>, urthmut…@aol.com says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->can you show me an instance where having compassion IS a weakness? >>Having compassion is not necessarily a weakness – it can be a sign of >>incredible strength and morality. >(not that women have the answers to everything)

Response:

In article <3be0a871.2475569@news-server>, moc.rr.xoc@mla says… >>The right thing is sometimes not as clear as day >>but many shades of grey. >True, but love and respect must be earned.  A worthless person doesn’t >deserve such things.

To say a person is worthless is passing judgement – and I don’t think anyone should judge another to be worthless, although they may have all the signs that they are on their lowest rung in life. There is a so-called worthless group of people, that is all too often stereotyped – and I don’t think they ought not to be given compassion and kindness. Who knows when they will be receptive to a kindful act – not many will come their way, so hopefully they will be appreciative and thoughtful as to why that person did what they did. I don’t think love ought to be earned. Love is many things to as many people. We all have differing views about love. Harvey

Response:

bollocks everyone has some use respect them at least for that! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->True, but love and respect must be earned.  A worthless person doesn’t >deserve such things.

Response:

On 01 Nov 2001 16:49:12 GMT, urthmut…@aol.com (Bert) wrote: >bollocks >everyone has some use >respect them at least for that!

No they don’t! There are plenty of useless people: alcoholics, sluts (well, they can be fun, but it’s no big loss if they die,) murderers .. generally any kind of criminal, really. >>True, but love and respect must be earned.  A worthless person doesn’t >>deserve such things.

ALM #129dx———————– E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

can you show me an instance where having compassion IS a weakness? >Having compassion is not necessarily a weakness – it can be a sign of >incredible strength and morality.

(not that women have the answers to everything)

Response:

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 03:49:32 GMT, kiwilove_nospample…@es.co.nz (My name = Harvey) wrote: >It’s not easy to forgive those who trespass against you – >those who would kill you – but you have to be able to do it, >to see the point of freedom and liberty/etc.

Ah, you’re right, what better expression of my freedom is there than to be run over by some idiot drunk driver. WHOO! LONG LIVE AMERICA! >It’s best to extend out the hand of friendship, rather than >a fist ready to strike out.

Whatever the world has taught you. Have you never heard "do unto others as you would have others do unto you?" >The right thing is sometimes not as clear as day >but many shades of grey.

True, but love and respect must be earned.  A worthless person doesn’t deserve such things. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Harvey >In article <3bdf64e6.53520358@news-server>, moc.rr.xoc@mla says… >>On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 01:12:33 GMT, kiwil…@es.co.nz.nomore (Your Name >>Here = Harvey) wrote: >>>The want of companionship crosses all cultures and divides. >>>It is a far nobler want than be that of religious fanaticism – which occurs >>>in some other cultures, in which women are not treated better or equal. >>>You can have friends, but that is not enough – is it. >>>It is not necessarily American culture this or that — >>>Americans tend to forget that they are imports too, and their culture >>>comes from other parts — and who stands in judgement over which culture >>>is best? We choose what culture is best suited to us — individually. >>>Having compassion is not necessarily a weakness – it can be a sign of >>>incredible strength and morality. >>Depends on who you’re compassionate to. If it’s to the immoral, then >>you’re just an idiot. >>>Harvey >>>In article <d47e14e6.0110292149.7e083…@posting.google.com>, >>>leole…@my-deja.com says… >>>>Are you suffering from loneliness because you have no girl friend? >>>> Is Girl friend answer to your loneliness? if you say yes on either of >>>>that, >>>> you must be another stupid naive American sicko. NO matter how many >>>>girl >>>>friend you have had or whether you have or not, your loneliness can >>>>never >>>> be solved by girl friend. If you do not understand what this mean, >>>>you are in big trouble that. It has been known that intimacy is not >>>>really >>>>the answer to the loneliness. The solution is more dynamic than simply >>>> friendship is all the answer. >>>>I’m truly sicked and tired of a bunch of stupid  American sicko’s >>>>girl-friendless lamentation. This is your culture disease that taught >>>>by your >>>>sick culture.   >>>>I do believe that the solution for loneliness is more deeper than >>>>having >>>>friendship or companion. >>ALM #129dx———————– >>E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla >>(typed backwards to prevent SPAM) >>Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

ALM #129dx———————– E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

It’s not easy to forgive those who trespass against you – those who would kill you – but you have to be able to do it, to see the point of freedom and liberty/etc. It’s best to extend out the hand of friendship, rather than a fist ready to strike out. The right thing is sometimes not as clear as day but many shades of grey. Harvey In article <3bdf64e6.53520358@news-server>, moc.rr.xoc@mla says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 01:12:33 GMT, kiwil…@es.co.nz.nomore (Your Name >Here = Harvey) wrote: >>The want of companionship crosses all cultures and divides. >>It is a far nobler want than be that of religious fanaticism – which occurs >>in some other cultures, in which women are not treated better or equal. >>You can have friends, but that is not enough – is it. >>It is not necessarily American culture this or that — >>Americans tend to forget that they are imports too, and their culture >>comes from other parts — and who stands in judgement over which culture >>is best? We choose what culture is best suited to us — individually. >>Having compassion is not necessarily a weakness – it can be a sign of >>incredible strength and morality. >Depends on who you’re compassionate to. If it’s to the immoral, then >you’re just an idiot. >>Harvey >>In article <d47e14e6.0110292149.7e083…@posting.google.com>, >>leole…@my-deja.com says… >>>Are you suffering from loneliness because you have no girl friend? >>> Is Girl friend answer to your loneliness? if you say yes on either of >>>that, >>> you must be another stupid naive American sicko. NO matter how many >>>girl >>>friend you have had or whether you have or not, your loneliness can >>>never >>> be solved by girl friend. If you do not understand what this mean, >>>you are in big trouble that. It has been known that intimacy is not >>>really >>>the answer to the loneliness. The solution is more dynamic than simply >>> friendship is all the answer. >>>I’m truly sicked and tired of a bunch of stupid  American sicko’s >>>girl-friendless lamentation. This is your culture disease that taught >>>by your >>>sick culture.   >>>I do believe that the solution for loneliness is more deeper than >>>having >>>friendship or companion. >ALM #129dx———————– >E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla >(typed backwards to prevent SPAM) >Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 01:12:33 GMT, kiwil…@es.co.nz.nomore (Your Name Here = Harvey) wrote: >The want of companionship crosses all cultures and divides. >It is a far nobler want than be that of religious fanaticism – which occurs >in some other cultures, in which women are not treated better or equal. >You can have friends, but that is not enough – is it. >It is not necessarily American culture this or that — >Americans tend to forget that they are imports too, and their culture >comes from other parts — and who stands in judgement over which culture >is best? We choose what culture is best suited to us — individually. >Having compassion is not necessarily a weakness – it can be a sign of >incredible strength and morality.

Depends on who you’re compassionate to. If it’s to the immoral, then you’re just an idiot. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Harvey >In article <d47e14e6.0110292149.7e083…@posting.google.com>, >leole…@my-deja.com says… >>Are you suffering from loneliness because you have no girl friend? >> Is Girl friend answer to your loneliness? if you say yes on either of >>that, >> you must be another stupid naive American sicko. NO matter how many >>girl >>friend you have had or whether you have or not, your loneliness can >>never >> be solved by girl friend. If you do not understand what this mean, >>you are in big trouble that. It has been known that intimacy is not >>really >>the answer to the loneliness. The solution is more dynamic than simply >> friendship is all the answer. >>I’m truly sicked and tired of a bunch of stupid  American sicko’s >>girl-friendless lamentation. This is your culture disease that taught >>by your >>sick culture.   >>I do believe that the solution for loneliness is more deeper than >>having >>friendship or companion.

ALM #129dx———————– E-mail: moc.rr.xoc@mla (typed backwards to prevent SPAM) Website: home.cox.rr.com/alm

Response:

The want of companionship crosses all cultures and divides. It is a far nobler want than be that of religious fanaticism – which occurs in some other cultures, in which women are not treated better or equal. You can have friends, but that is not enough – is it. It is not necessarily American culture this or that — Americans tend to forget that they are imports too, and their culture comes from other parts — and who stands in judgement over which culture is best? We choose what culture is best suited to us — individually. Having compassion is not necessarily a weakness – it can be a sign of incredible strength and morality. Harvey In article <d47e14e6.0110292149.7e083…@posting.google.com>, leole…@my-deja.com says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Are you suffering from loneliness because you have no girl friend? > Is Girl friend answer to your loneliness? if you say yes on either of >that, > you must be another stupid naive American sicko. NO matter how many >girl >friend you have had or whether you have or not, your loneliness can >never > be solved by girl friend. If you do not understand what this mean, >you are in big trouble that. It has been known that intimacy is not >really >the answer to the loneliness. The solution is more dynamic than simply > friendship is all the answer. >I’m truly sicked and tired of a bunch of stupid  American sicko’s >girl-friendless lamentation. This is your culture disease that taught >by your >sick culture.   >I do believe that the solution for loneliness is more deeper than >having >friendship or companion.

Response:

This is all well and good, but if you DON’T have a girlfriend and you never have had one, it does tend to consume you just a bit. Some people have a load of friends and are never alone, but they feel lonely still because they don’t HAVE that special someone. "leolee" <leole…@my-deja.com> wrote in message

news:d47e14e6.0110292149.7e083826@posting.google.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Are you suffering from loneliness because you have no girl friend? >  Is Girl friend answer to your loneliness? if you say yes on either of > that, >  you must be another stupid naive American sicko. NO matter how many > girl > friend you have had or whether you have or not, your loneliness can > never >  be solved by girl friend. If you do not understand what this mean, > you are in big trouble that. It has been known that intimacy is not > really > the answer to the loneliness. The solution is more dynamic than simply >  friendship is all the answer. > I’m truly sicked and tired of a bunch of stupid  American sicko’s > girl-friendless lamentation. This is your culture disease that taught > by your > sick culture. > I do believe that the solution for loneliness is more deeper than > having > friendship or companion.

Response:

Are you suffering from loneliness because you have no girl friend?  Is Girl friend answer to your loneliness? if you say yes on either of that,  you must be another stupid naive American sicko. NO matter how many girl friend you have had or whether you have or not, your loneliness can never  be solved by girl friend. If you do not understand what this mean, you are in big trouble that. It has been known that intimacy is not really the answer to the loneliness. The solution is more dynamic than simply  friendship is all the answer. I’m truly sicked and tired of a bunch of stupid  American sicko’s girl-friendless lamentation. This is your culture disease that taught by your sick culture.   I do believe that the solution for loneliness is more deeper than having friendship or companion.

Response:

Filed under: Loneliness Lonely

Related Posts

• Sad
• Birthdays (and a chance for me to talk)
• Dare I dream
• Songs about Loneliness
• Where are you, girl?
• Attn: Pamela
• Do ASDers use Different
• Welcome to alt.support.loneliness......
• Still Lonely
• anyone here?